# Amendment For Retrospective Award Cap

**URL:** <https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/amendment-for-retrospective-award-cap/1767>\
**Category:** Grants / Bounties\
**Created:** [9 May 2023 11:59 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/amendment-for-retrospective-award-cap/1767 "2023-05-09T11:59:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Valdorff](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/valdorff/32/319_2.png) [@Valdorff](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/Valdorff)\
**Post date:** [9 May 2023 12:52 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/amendment-for-retrospective-award-cap/1767/2 "2023-05-09T12:52:05Z")

</div>

My preference would be either:

- Don’t count work from before first GMC round towards the cap
  - Redo some math from the past to see where were at
  - This preserves the forward focus originally intended, but likely clears the backlog (or most of it)

- Remove the cap entirely [update 5/19: I no longer like this option, see below]

Setting the cap high enough that it does nothing doesn’t make sense to me.

---

_[View the full topic](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/amendment-for-retrospective-award-cap/1767)._