# Houston Specification Discrepancies

**URL:** <https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/houston-specification-discrepancies/2958>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [3 May 2024 17:25 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/houston-specification-discrepancies/2958 "2024-05-03T17:25:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![knoshua](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/knoshua/32/128_2.png) [@knoshua](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/knoshua)\
**Post date:** [4 May 2024 07:08 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/houston-specification-discrepancies/2958/3 "2024-05-04T07:08:51Z")

</div>

So I don’t forget, v10 would create a new discrepancy:

Per [RPIP-31](https://rpips.rocketpool.net/RPIPs/RPIP-31#claiming-rpl-rewards):

> If a node operator is in the smoothing pool a claim of RPL will also distribute ETH rewards

With [Reward Tree Spec v10](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/rewards-tree-spec-v10/2937) a claim of RPL will no longer distribute ETH rewards if the RPL withdrawal is set and different from the primary withdrawal address.

---

_[View the full topic](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/houston-specification-discrepancies/2958)._
