# Increase rETH demand by reducing the voter share from 9% to 5% (Sentiment Poll)

**URL:** <https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/increase-reth-demand-by-reducing-the-voter-share-from-9-to-5-sentiment-poll/3969>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [11 June 2026 00:36 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/increase-reth-demand-by-reducing-the-voter-share-from-9-to-5-sentiment-poll/3969 "2026-06-11T00:36:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![haloooloolo](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/haloooloolo/32/1155_2.png) [@haloooloolo](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/haloooloolo)\
**Post date:** [15 June 2026 11:30 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/increase-reth-demand-by-reducing-the-voter-share-from-9-to-5-sentiment-poll/3969/23 "2026-06-15T11:30:10Z")

</div>

> [@Nazca](#):
>
> This will be a one-time boost to the queue, and then it will not have a continuous effect

The main point of exiting underperformers is to increase rETH yield, not to free up space for other node operators.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![THe-D.eth](https://dao.rocketpool.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/a6a055/32.png) [@THe-D.eth](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/THe-D.eth)\
**Post date:** [21 June 2026 23:01 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/increase-reth-demand-by-reducing-the-voter-share-from-9-to-5-sentiment-poll/3969/24 "2026-06-21T23:01:10Z")

</div>

Given that discussions+actions takes months and not days I think small movements are smart but they might not get the job done. What we need is a variable rate for NO’s.

Edit: I don’t care that its AI. Get with the times

[Previous page](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/increase-reth-demand-by-reducing-the-voter-share-from-9-to-5-sentiment-poll/3969.md?page=1)