# MC Budget update proposal **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [20 October 2023 16:07 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319 "2023-10-20T16:07:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Valdorff](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/valdorff/32/319_2.png) [@Valdorff](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/Valdorff)\ **Post date:** [20 October 2023 16:07 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319/1 "2023-10-20T16:07:14Z")
Hi all – I plan to make a budget update proposal vote (after the voting body stuff is complete). The pull request at [2023\_09 budget update proposal by Valdorff · Pull Request #75 · rocket-pool/RPIPs · GitHub](https://github.com/rocket-pool/RPIPs/pull/75) has been updated to include periods 14 and 15. I think I pre-calculated 15 ok, but have wording in there to allow reality to supersede my theoretical calculation if I missed something. ![image](https://dao.rocketpool.net/uploads/default/original/1X/2f30e0f6b88ceb9b36ec780409941f2c6cac70a7.png) There are 3 things happening here: - One-time payment to make up for the split not matching intent for several periods - Correct the split to match intent moving forward for both IMC and GMC - Further increase the IMC’s split based on the low end of the poll [here](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/justification-for-moving-odao-inflation-to-the-imc/1939/12) This is an offshoot of [Justification for moving oDAO inflation to the IMC - #24 by Valdorff](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/justification-for-moving-odao-inflation-to-the-imc/1939/24), and I want to point to @epineph’s comment right after mine. The structure I’ve put in right now makes sense to me, but if the community has a preference for splitting into multiple votes, we can do that too. ---
**Author:** ![jasperthegovghost](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/jasperthegovghost/32/401_2.png) [@jasperthegovghost](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/jasperthegovghost)\ **Post date:** [20 October 2023 20:33 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319/2 "2023-10-20T20:33:42Z")
Even thought this is on the lower end of the poll, I support this proposal structure. ---
**Author:** ![waqwaqattack](https://dao.rocketpool.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/45deac/32.png) [@waqwaqattack](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/waqwaqattack)\ **Post date:** [23 October 2023 13:07 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319/3 "2023-10-23T13:07:20Z")
This makes sense. Let’s do it. ---
**Author:** ![Valdorff](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/valdorff/32/319_2.png) [@Valdorff](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/Valdorff)\ **Post date:** [23 October 2023 20:55 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319/4 "2023-10-23T20:55:37Z")
_Poll ([view on site](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319/4))_ As ever, if undecided or opposed, a comment would be greatly appreciated to help understand if there’s something that can be tweaked to address a concern. ---
**Author:** ![Pat\_The\_Weekly\_Orbit](https://dao.rocketpool.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/f04885/32.png) [@Pat\_The\_Weekly\_Orbit](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/Pat_The_Weekly_Orbit)\ **Post date:** [1 November 2023 16:31 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319/5 "2023-11-01T16:31:25Z")
Looks good. Let’s move forward. ---
**Author:** ![Patches](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/patches/32/121_2.png) [@Patches](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/Patches)\ **Post date:** [5 November 2023 23:26 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/mc-budget-update-proposal/2319/6 "2023-11-05T23:26:29Z")
I’m voting for this proposal. The impact to the GMC budget shouldn’t be too bad considering they have a reserve internally.