Summary
The community is currently debating the best ways to use the funds granted from RPL inflation, particularly those allocated to the pDAO. There are reasonable requests for these funds to be used in ways that bring the greatest value to the protocol and are sensitive to the limits of these funds.
This proposal is aimed at creating greater equity in the allocation of inflation rewards, so that they can be proportioned to the most pressing demands for the Rocket Pool protocol and contribute to its growth and success.
I believe the most effective way to do this is to re-proportion, at least temporarily, part of the inflation rewards from the oDAO to the pDAO. I justify this with an historical look at how these the distribution of rewards came about and highlight the stark differences in RPL inflation between the various ‘pots’.
Disclaimer
This is not meant to be a critique of the usefulness and value of the oDAO. It is a wholly necessary component of the protocol, and the oDAO should (and I believe still will be) handsomely rewarded for its role in ensuring the security and success of the protocol.
I’m writing this on a plane, using my memory and rough figures. Please do suggest corrections for anything that is wrong.
History
RPL inflation currently 5% per year, which is ~900,000 RPL ($28.6MM). This was originally allocated between four identified pots within the protocol, which per year were:
- Node Operator Rewards (70%; 585,000 RPL; $18.6MM)
- Oracle DAO Rewards (10%; 90,000 RPL; $2.8MM)
- Protocol DAO Rewards (10%; 90,000 RPL; $2.8MM)
- Insurance Pool Rewards (10%; 90,000 RPL; $2.8MM)
This allocation prioritised NOs with the view that they were integral to the protocol and should receive the majority of rewards. Nearer to the launch, the team felt that the insurance pool was not, at least at the time, a necessary part of the protocol and the rewards from that pot were distributed equally to the pDAO and oDAO. Each would receive an extra 5% of inflation rewards, moving to the following distribution:
- Node Operator Rewards (70%; 585,000 RPL; $18.6MM)
- Oracle DAO Rewards (15%; 135,000 RPL; $4.3MM)
- Protocol DAO Rewards (15%; 135,000 RPL; $4.3MM)
Distribution per ‘Capita’
I use quotes around capita as I am fully aware that these metrics, often based on ethereum addresses, are not representative of a single person. However, they are good approximations for the purposes of my argument. I respect that members of the oDAO are often institutions that represent many people and their value is beyond the sum of its parts – you can use your own multiples if you wish, but I’m not convinced any reasonable multiplier will change the thrust of the argument.
This is what the RPL inflation rewards look like per capita per year:
Node Operators:
- 585,000 RPL / 955 NOs = 612 RPL; ~$19,000
Oracle DAO:
- 135,000 RPL / 14 oDAOs = 9,642 RPL - ~9 ETH fees for duties @ 75 gwei = 8,761 RPL; ~$275,000
Protocol DAO:
- 135,000 RPL / 2574 rETH holders + 955 NOs + 14 oDAOs = 38 RPL; ~$1,200
This is crude, but I think it shows the inequity in the current allocation of inflation rewards. Many community members are making proposals for pDAO spending that are rightly scrutinised by the team and community for value for money, but I believe part of the constraint in spending is due to the disproportionate allocation of RPL inflation.
If we take the current NO RPL reward APR as fair and reasonable for their duties to the protocol (around 13% APR at present, but going down precipitously), I think the current rewards for the oDAO (550% APR on the 1750 RPL locked up) and over quarter of a million dollars per member is, frankly, better spent on bolstering the pDAO in the early stages of the protocol. I am unsure whether an argument could be made that this kind of compensation is proportionate to the needs of a well-funded pDAO during this critical early growth period. Further, I believe there is an assumption implicit in this equal allocation of rewards that the oDAO, as a part of the protocol, is of the same value as the many, many activities that come under the remit of the pDAO.
Proposal
I think the previous equal distribution of the insurance pool rewards between the oDAO and pDAO was inequitable, and the pDAO could make better use of these funds. For greater equity, protocol growth and effective use of funds I would propose the following:
- Node Operator Rewards (70%; 585,000 RPL; $18.6MM)
- Oracle DAO Rewards (10%; 90,000 RPL; $2.8MM)
- Protocol DAO Rewards (20%; 180,000 RPL; $5.7MM)
This would change the oDAO per member rewards to 5547 RPL per year or ~$175,000 (after ETH fees incurred), which I believe still hugely respects the role of the oDAO in the protocol, but also allows us to allocate limited funds more effectively to the multiple use-cases of the pDAO.
Curious what community thinks and if different proportions sit better with them.