# Revised GMC Split Proposal **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [31 December 2024 16:18 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/revised-gmc-split-proposal/3430 "2024-12-31T16:18:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 26
**Author:** ![drdoofus](https://dao.rocketpool.net/user_avatar/dao.rocketpool.net/drdoofus/32/403_2.png) [@drdoofus](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/drdoofus)\ **Post date:** [13 March 2025 13:22 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/revised-gmc-split-proposal/3430/26 "2025-03-13T13:22:08Z")
The original calculation I did when bringing up the oDAO increase was for a 1.5% shift to oDAO, but it roughly showed a 52% / 22% / 26% split would be needed to keep IMC/GMC the same in absolute RPL income: > [@Is oDAO Fatigue an Issue?](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/is-odao-fatigue-an-issue/3419/5): > > Personally, I wouldn’t mind a small increase to oDAO (reminder, I am not on the oDAO). I hope I’m not thrashed for that opinion, lol. It would end up coming out of the treasury, ultimately, so the absolute RPL value to IMC and GMC would be the same (can’t decrease NO rewards, imo). One thing I want to avoid that I heard spoke of once in the past is having pDAO/GMC etc. provide any type of reward or compensation directly to the oDAO. I don’t think we want pDAO to have even any pretense of “direc… Obviously, it’s a basic calculation, I just didn’t redo it for 1% oDAO shift. If IMC wants the same as before and GMC needs a little more, maybe a 52% / 24% / 24% is more palatable. In a way it starts splitting hairs, but I’m open to it. --- _[View the full topic](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/revised-gmc-split-proposal/3430)._