# Round 8 - GMC Call for Bounty Applications - Deadline is January 14

**URL:** <https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/round-8-gmc-call-for-bounty-applications-deadline-is-january-14/2558>\
**Category:** Grants / Bounties\
**Tags:** gmc\_round\_8, gmc\_bounty\_apps\
**Created:** [11 December 2023 01:30 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/round-8-gmc-call-for-bounty-applications-deadline-is-january-14/2558 "2023-12-11T01:30:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KentuckyFC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/db5fbb/32.png) [@KentuckyFC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/u/KentuckyFC)\
**Post date:** [8 January 2024 03:29 UTC](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/round-8-gmc-call-for-bounty-applications-deadline-is-january-14/2558/3 "2024-01-08T03:29:09Z")

</div>

Apologies in advance if this is not the right forum to discuss what @jasperthegovghost had mentioned.

“This should be done while Rocket Pool retains senior debt”. Is this even technically feasible? Doesn’t EigenLayer mandate withdrawal addresses set to their EigenPod addresses for it to be considered as “economic security” by EigenLayer?  
If EL eigenpods are withdrawal addresses, any risk to EL will jeopardize RP. It feels like an either/or for withdrawal addresses.  
Am I missing something basic here?

---

_[View the full topic](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/round-8-gmc-call-for-bounty-applications-deadline-is-january-14/2558)._