Alignment Statement
I’ve been part of the RocketPool community since the days of the Pyrmont Beta and have been holding RPL ever since. I have been a node operator since March of '22. Simply put, my own success with my RocketPool investment is tied directly with the success of the protocol as a whole. If node operators are the backbone of RocketPool, rETH stakers are the blood. Their success in being able to efficiently obtain rETH, hold it, engage in further opportunities as desired, and exit efficiently is at the core of what RocketPool is about. By supporting this, the IMC encourages the healthy growth of rETH which in turn encourages the launching of minipools and drives demand for RPL. And generally, that would be good for my bags.
Conflict Statement
I do not believe I have any conflicts of interest with the goals of the IMC. My crypto holdings are mainly all in RPL and Eth. I do have a small amount of SAFE tokens from the Gnosis safe airdrop that are currently not trade-able. I also have a very small amount of vCOW vesting over the next couple years from the Cowswap airdrop. I do occasionally use other yield protocols when opportunities present themselves, but only with a small portion of my holdings and I would happily stand back from personal use of any protocols should it credibly suggest a conflict. When awarded airdrops, my tendency is to not hold them for long periods of time unless it would be something I find deep alignment with which is pretty rare. I do hold some other index funds in tradfi, but I barely pay attention to those.
Identity Statement
I go by ‘NonFungibleYokem’ here and on discord. I prefer to remain pseudonymous in public, but I don’t mind sharing more specifics of my identity in private.
I live in Oregon with my kids and work as a systems/network administrator and team lead for a small B2B focused service company where I’ve been for over 10 years now.
My interest in crypto in general is based in my belief that good cryptography and game theory can produce healthier social environments for collective action by constraining trust requirements and limiting the responsibilities and scope of action of privileged actors. By using these tools, strong communities can be built that can accomplish big things. I believe Ethereum has excelled at this kind of community building, and RocketPool has done well at building on that community, and by contributing back to it.
I’m big believer in free and open source software as an important check on the tendencies of proprietary technologies to constrain freedom more then they enable new productive capabilities. And I stand by that as Linux destkop user for over 20 years now.
My broader attitudes include being skeptical of doomerism of all kinds, being on the lookout for the trickier trade-offs of what appear to be simple solutions, and that rarely does any particular property or attribute exist on a simple linear spectrum.
Contribution Statement
As said above, I have been part of the RocketPool Discord community since the Pyrmont beta in April of '21. I’ve aimed to be a modest shitposter while adding insightful commentary where I can. Other things I’ve done:
- A couple of not too well received governance proposals (but which maybe prompted further work from others?)
- Demonstrated a proof of concept of using a Gnosis Safe as a node wallet on Goerli/Prater.
- Occasionally provided assistance in #support when and where I can.
- Did some Rockets Contracts studies so I can better understand the real terms and conditions a big chunk of my net worth is under.
- Participated in the Redstone and Atlas beta tests and provided feedback as I found it.
Additional Information
With Atlas, RocketPool and rETH are in some new territory for opportunities that are only possible with the better supply of rETH. In addition the onboarding of rETH to lending protocols and the availability of the Chainlink feed means that rETH can be used in many awesome ways that were not possible before. But these new defi opportunities could present risks to those that simply want hold rETH in a more conservative manner. The IMC needs to have some awareness in its actions with regard to balancing encouragement of availability of those opportunities along with preventing larger risks they might pose should they trigger a depegging event. The IMC has been highly successful in using the ‘bribe’ based liquidity incentive infrastructure to high efficiency and that should continue as long as that efficiency remains sustainable. But we should be aware that it may not remain so, and have some idea of alternative plans to keep our on-peg liquidity up if the efficiency were to decline.