As I’ve mentioned before, I think all GMC members in Year 2 have been fantastic contributors, and the DAO would be in excellent shape if they all continued. However, with some members stepping down, there’s also value in bringing in fresh perspectives.
I’ll keep refining my votes as we go along. My current voting priorities are as follows (in order of importance):
- Ensuring each subcommittee has a strong balance and representation (development, research, marketing). I believe it’s essential to have at least one returning member in each subcommittee to provide continuity in past discussions, application decisions, and accumulated experience.
- Member availability
- Enthusiasm from members who genuinely want to serve.