I started over on the other thread and am just catching up to this vote thread…
I’m not 100% certain on what you mean with Option 2. My interpretation is Option 2 would be “No Contract Control” (but CCIP still charges a fee)? It seems like we are not locked in to option 2 or 3, since CCIP can change the fee in the future… so from that perspective I’d prefer to do no fee at first, and then experiment with a more complex/tiered fee structure of some kind later. The main risk with option 2 and 3 is that we are at the whims of Chainlink, but I think the only way to avoid that is if we maintain ownership of the contract address? I don’t think there is a way for us to maintain ownership/control of the fee without maintaining ownership of the entire contract address? I think that is both too high of a risk (for rETH Ronin users and the actual people managing whatever multisig is setup), and will take too long to set something up imo…
I’m not sure how to vote for no fee at first, and then implement one later - but I think it aligns most closely with option 3 since that would be aligned in the short term, so that’s what I’ll vote for here.