Contract Verification with Guides
Who is the proposed retrospective award recipient?
What specific project or work is the retrospective award in recognition of? Please detail what the project or work entailed and the duration over which it took place.
Atlas verification: https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/odao-membership-interest-peteris/1654/6, https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/odao-membership-interest-peteris/1654/8, https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/odao-membership-interest-peteris/1654/13
Houston verification: https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/odao-membership-interest-peteris/1654/22
Are the subjects of this award entirely open source (MIT, GPL, Apache, CC BY license or similar)? If not, which parts will not be, why, and under what license will they be published?
Benefit
This benefits every participant in the protocol (rETH, NO, RPL holder) helping verify that the contracts in the repository (which are the audited contracts) are the same as the deployed contracts which would be voted in by the oDAO.
It also benefits oDAO members by providing a guide to doing appropriate diligence on the contract so that they don’t need to trust the team’s tools (or even peteris’ tools, as the guide walks through what’s being done quite clearly).
Costs
How much USD $ is the applicant requesting be awarded to the recipient?
I think $2000-2500 would be reasonable per verification, so $4000-5000 for the 2 verifications done so far.
Is the applicant requesting RPL or LUSD?
RPL
Conflict of Interest
Does the person or persons requesting the retrospective award have any conflicts of interest to disclose? (Please disclose here if you are a member of the GMC or if you have nominated a member of the GMC for this retrospective award).
I am requesting this on behalf of @peteris and have no relevant conflicts of interest.