Round 36 - GMC Call for Grant Applications - Deadline is May 7

This thread is for applications for Rocket Pool’s April 7, 2026 - May 7, 2026 grants. Please only post grant applications in this thread. If you would like to discuss and/or ask questions about any applications you see in this thread, we ask that you do so in this separate forum thread which has been established for all community discussions related to this round of applications. Only those grant applications that are posted in this thread and timestamped by May 7, 2026 at 23:59 (11:59 PM) UTC will be considered. Any grants posted after that deadline will be carried over to the next award period.

This is the expected schedule for round 36:

  • Application Period (April 7 - May 7)
  • Scoring Deadline (May 26)
  • Final Voting Amendments, Discussion and Finalization (May 27 - May 30)
  • Award Announcement (May 31)
Differences Between Grants and Bounties Grants are intended to be applied for by those who are wishing to carry out the work themselves. Bounties are open-ended goals that could be met by anyone, including those other than the proposing party. In other words, if I believed that Rocket Pool needed a fifty-foot paper mache orange rocket for publicity purposes and I wanted to be the one to built it, I would apply for a grant. If I instead thought Rocket Pool needed a fifty-foot paper mache orange rocket for publicity purposes but I wanted it to be open to whoever built it first to claim the reward (similar to a prize), then I’d apply for a bounty.

To guide you in your application, the GMC has established the following goals and the following scoring rubric:

GMC Goals

Grants, bounties, and retrospective awards should make it easier and/or more attractive to do one or more of the following:

  • become a node operator

  • operate a node, mint rETH

  • hold or use rETH

  • improve the quality of life for the protocol and its community.

Grants Rubric

When evaluating grant applications, the GMC takes into account the following goals:

  • If the application is successful, to what extent does it further the GMC goals?

  • To what extent can the application be feasibly carried out by the person(s) proposed to complete it?

  • If the application is successful, how large is the benefit to the protocol relative to the size of the proposed costs

Grant Application Template

Please copy paste the template below into a reply. Answer the questions there, feel free to remove or add sections based on relevance.

## Name of Grant

### What is the work being proposed?

### Is there any related work this builds off of?

### Will the results of this project be entirely open source ([MIT](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT), [GPL](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html), [Apache](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0), [CC BY](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license or similar)? If not, which parts will not be, why, and under what license will they be published?



## Benefit

<please enter N/A where appropriate>

| Group | Benefits |
|---|---|
| Potential rETH holders | If the grant is successfully completed, how does this help people looking to stake ETH for rETH? |
| rETH holders | If the grant is successfully completed, how does this help rETH holders? |
| Potential NOs |  If the grant is successfully completed, how does this help people looking to run a Rocket Pool node for the first time? |
| NOs | If the grant is successfully completed, how does this help people already running a Rocket Pool node? |
| Community |  If the grant is successfully completed, how does this help the Rocket Pool community? |
| RPL holders |  If the grant is successfully completed, how does this help RPL holders? |

### Which other non-RPL protocols, DAOs, projects, or individuals, would stand to benefit from this grant?



## Work

### Who is doing the work?

### What is the background of the person(s) doing the work? What experience do they have with such projects in the past?

### What is the breakdown of the proposed work, in terms of milestones and/or deadlines?

### How is the work being tested? Is testing included in the schedule?

### How will the work be maintained after delivery?



## Costs

### What is the acceptance criteria?

### What is the proposed payment schedule for the grant? How much USD $ and over what period of time is the applicant requesting?

### Who will directly receive the payment? (Required — the GMC can only send grants directly to a recipient address and cannot accept invoices.)

### How will the GMC verify that the work delivered matches the proposed cadence?

### What alternatives or options have been considered in order to save costs for the proposed project?

### Have you already been compensated by the RP protocol in any way for this work?



## Conflict of Interest

### Does the person or persons proposing the grant have any conflicts of interest to disclose? (Please disclose here if you are a member of the GMC or if any member of the GMC would benefit directly financially from the grant).

### Will the recipient of the grant, or any protocol or project in which the recipient has a vested interest (other than Rocket Pool), benefit financially if the grant is successful?
  1. Name of grant: The rETH Institutional Safety & Reporting Module
  2. What is the work being proposed?

Kodelab (https://kodelab.io/) proposes developing:

- A reporting engine: translating rETH on-chain events (exchange rate growth, rewards) into real-time UK regulatory filing templates.

- Operational risk controls: implementing automated ‘circuit breakers’ and collateral monitoring frameworks reviewed under live regulatory supervision.

- Wind-down logic: creating a pre-programmed, vetted ‘exit’ procedure for institutional participants - a mandatory requirement for most institutions.

3. Is there any related work this builds off of?

This project builds directly upon TALOC, the world’s first piece of blockchain technology tested within the FCA Regulatory Sandbox and developed under the supervision of the HKMA.

4. How does this help people looking to stake ETH for rETH?

It removes the compliance glass-ceiling for institutional allocators. By providing an operational wrapper that satisfies fiduciary and regulatory duties, large-scale holders who were previously sidelined can safely move ETH into rETH.

5. How does this help rETH holders?

It increases the utility and liquidity of rETH. By creating an FCA-tested environment for lending and reporting, rETH becomes more an insto-compatible asset that could even start to be considered collateral in regulated financial markets.

6. How does this help people looking to run a Rocket Pool node for the first time?

For institutional entities, it provides a turnkey compliance stack. They can launch nodes with the operational resilience documentation and wind-down plans already in place to satisfy their internal risk committees.

7. How does this help people already running a Rocket Pool node?

It provides advanced SupTech (Supervisory Technology) tools for professional scaling. As node operators move toward Saturn Megapools, the automated reporting engine reduces the overhead of tracking and filing rewards for hundreds of validators.

8. How does this help the Rocket Pool community?

It diversifies the staking base by onboarding high-trust capital. This hardens the protocol against centralization by allowing regulated UK and global firms to participate in a decentralized network without violating their local compliance laws.

9. How does this help RPL holders?

By facilitating institutional node operators, it drives demand for RPL as primary collateral for those nodes. Institutional participants typically seek long-term, stable positions, providing a sticky demand layer for the RPL token.

10. Which other non-RPL protocols, DAOs, or individuals benefit?

  • Institutions: Who gain a regulated path to Ethereum staking yield.

  • Regulators (eg. FCA/BIS): Who benefit from the increased transparency of the SupTech reporting suite.

11. Team and Breakdown of Work (Milestones)

Kodelab is a ‘full-service’, award-winning digital asset consultancy based in the UK. It provides advice and resources under 3 pillars: Development, Product and Policy, whilst also offering a compliant blockchain product suite, made up of:

The world’s first FCA-tested piece of blockchain technology - the bank-grade ‘TALOC’ lending protocol. [Created under supervision of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Currency Research Award Recipient (2024), featured technology at University of Cambridge, World Economic Forum and BIS ‘Supervisory Technology’ showcase (2024), FCA Regulatory Sandbox participant 2025]

Legal stack and marketplace infrastructure allowing the trading of entire UK properties is tokenised form [FCA crypto registration pending]

  • Milestone 1 (Week 3): Mapping rETH/Rocket Pool architecture to TALOC risk and control frameworks.

  • Milestone 2 (Week 9): Engineering the Reporting Engine and real-time dashboard for rETH events.

  • Milestone 3 (Week 12): Delivery of the “Rocket Pool Wind-Down Template” and final stress-testing.

12. How is the work being tested?

Testing is fully integrated into the 12-week schedule. It includes:

  • Regulatory validation: aligning reporting outputs with current UK regulatory templates.

  • Technical stress-testing: Simulating extreme market events to verify circuit breaker logic and wind-down execution.

13. Maintenance after delivery

Kodelab will offer ongoing updates to the reporting engine as UK/EU regulations evolve (e.g., updates to MiCA or the incoming FCA framework). Retainer tbd, outside of main grant

14. Proposed payment schedule

  • Total request: $100,000 USD.

  • Period: 3 months (Paid in monthly instalments upon milestone completion).

15. Verification of work

The GMC can verify progress through:

  • Open-source code: reviewing the reporting engine and EVM-compatible risk logic.

  • Technical deep dives via scheduled demos

16. Cost-saving alternatives

The project saves significant costs by recycling existing TALOC modular logic and FCA-vetted frameworks rather than building new regulatory compliance systems from scratch. This allows a $100k grant to deliver millions of dollars’ worth of R&D and regulatory reputation capital

17. No conflicts of interest

Chainlink rETH/ETH price feed

What is the work being proposed?

The core team currently funds the rETH/ETH Chainlink price feed, which publishes rETH’s on-chain market price for DeFi protocol integrations.

The feed underpins integrations including (but not limited to):

  • Liquity
  • Reserve Protocol
  • Spark

We’ve covered the $5,000/month cost for several years. We’re now proposing to move to a co-sponsorship model, with the DAO and ecosystem partners sharing the cost.

An ecosystem partner has already agreed to co-sponsor.

Is there any related work this builds off of?

The price feed supports DeFi integrations that drive demand for rETH through utility, particularly with lending protocols.

Will the results of this project be entirely open source (MIT, GPL, Apache, CC BY license or similar)? If not, which parts will not be, why, and under what license will they be published?

N/A

Benefit

Group Benefits
Potential rETH holders Supports utility of rETH within DeFi - such as lending or indexes. rETH is a highly integrated asset with a rich ecosystem of integrations.
rETH holders Supports utility of rETH within DeFi - such as lending or indexes
Potential NOs Through rETH demand this supports NO matching with protocol ETH
NOs Through rETH demand this supports NO matching with protocol ETH
Community Not as applicable
RPL holders Growth of the protocol TVL drives voter share and thus contributes to RPL value proposition

Which other non-RPL protocols, DAOs, projects, or individuals, would stand to benefit from this grant?

  • Liquity
  • Reserve Protocol

Work

Who is doing the work?

It is a service provided by Chainlink.

What is the background of the person(s) doing the work? What experience do they have with such projects in the past?

Chainlink are the most well known and experienced oracle providers in the space.

What is the breakdown of the proposed work, in terms of milestones and/or deadlines?

The proposed work is financial logistics.

How is the work being tested? Is testing included in the schedule?

N/A

How will the work be maintained after delivery?

Combined group from GMC, Core team, and ecosystem partners.

Costs

What is the proposed payment schedule for the grant? How much USD $ and over what period of time is the applicant requesting?

I would suggest a minimum term of 1 year but rolling. The current cost is $5K USD but this amount would be shared between parties. We may also work with Chainlink on that cost.

Who will directly receive the payment? (Required — the GMC can only send grants directly to a recipient address and cannot accept invoices.)

Chainlink

What alternatives or options have been considered in order to save costs for the proposed project?

The current feed is already integrated so other options are not really and option.

Have you already been compensated by the RP protocol in any way for this work?

No

Conflict of Interest

Does the person or persons proposing the grant have any conflicts of interest to disclose? (Please disclose here if you are a member of the GMC or if any member of the GMC would benefit directly financially from the grant).

None.

Will the recipient of the grant, or any protocol or project in which the recipient has a vested interest (other than Rocket Pool), benefit financially if the grant is successful?

None.

Notice: This message marks the closing of the thirty-sixth (36) round of Rocket Pool grant applications. Any applications submitted after this will not be considered for this round.