Forum vote can be found here.
Hey folks. This is intended to be the discussion thread for RPIP-39. The RPIP in question can be found in the usual place:
Summary
Essentially, this RPIP aims to empower the GMC to provide incentive rewards if they choose to do so for three activities within the bounty process. These activities are:
- Proposing a Bounty - Providing the initial idea and convincing the GMC that it is worth pursuing. (paid when the proposal is adopted by the GMC)
- Defining a Bounty - Providing a clear and actionable set of milestones, deliverables and key information that can be used by a bounty hunter to complete the bounty. (paid when the definition is adopted by the GMC)
- Supporting a Bounty Hunter - Ie, providing feedback, direction and assistance navigating Rocket Poolās processes and structures that a bounty hunter external to rocket pool may find challenging. (paid when a bounty is completed)
This proposal does not set hard numbers on these incentives, leaving those in the hands of the GMC. GMC decisions related to these incentives may be challenged using the existing GMC decision challenge process.
A set of recommendations are included that describe some of the authors thoughts related to lever setting. These are non-binding on the GMC, and are mainly just meant as a starting point for discussion.
@Valdorff (as RPIP editor) recommended that the @GMC propose some initial values prior to voting taking place. I donāt think thatās strictly necessary due to the challenge process, but I donāt object either.
Iāll follow up in a few days with a poll once thereās been some opportunity to discuss.
Initial Lever Recommendations
(section since removed from RPIP, included here so can be a part of the discussion)
These are non-binding recommendations to the GMC for initial incentive lever settings. They are included as a starting point for discussions and are not intended to limit GMC decision-making.
- For the first few months, levers SHOULD be set to higher levels, to reach a meaningful number of open bounties quickly.
- Lever A and B SHOULD NOT be zero unless unallocated GMC funds are low.
- Lever B SHOULD be higher than Lever A to incentivize the directly-actionable definitions over the not-directly-actionable proposals.
- Lever B SHOULD have a relative component, as higher-value bounties should be expected to have more detailed, more strict, and less ambiguous definitions.
- Lever C SHOULD be a focus for experimentation. It is difficult to know how useful or effective it will be without empirical testing.
- The sum of lever incentives SHOULD be less than 10% of the total bounty value under normal circumstances.