Alignment Statement
The main bit of alignment is that I quite like RP. I think it has the potential to be great for Ethereum health, it allows broader participation than solo staking, and I think there are many tough problems to solve along the way (I like problem solving :shrug:).
Secondarily, I have significant-to-me exposure to RP both via RPL and minipools.
Conflict Statement
I don’t do the “tribe” thing too much. I have provided feedback to Lido, and sought feedback from Lido contributors. I have provided feedback to Stader and Stakewise.
I have held lots of tokens off/on, in and outside of the Ethoverse: SWISE, BTC, ATOM, SCRT, AKT, ARB, blah, blah.
I have worked with a variety of web3 partners (both through IMC and not) and have definite preferences about working with some for not-purely-protocol-finances reasons. I think it’s appropriate to consider smooth working relationships.
I don’t see any of the above as conflicts, but it’s as close as I come.
Identity Statement
I’m a senior engineer currently working in IoT and have previously worked in semiconductors. While I don’t plan on fully doxxing, I’m happy to coarsely answer most questions about myself that come up.
Contribution Statement
Frankly, I do too many things. I have been de facto IMC lead on the partnership side and execution wallet side (shoutout to Samus for taking the treasurer and transaction creation things off my plate), de facto RPIP editor lead, am extremely active on the technical strategizing side of the pDAO, and am extremely active in governance in several ways (writing RPIPs, writing vote text, getting things attention, providing feedback, …). I talk to a ton of protocols both with and without my IMC hat, and shitpost a ton.
All of which is to say, I’d be super excited if we got some folks looking to do some of the beyond the baseline work in the role description.
As an aside cuz this reflection has me thinking… the stipend, while not supermassive, does go a long way towards making IMC work feel recognized as important.