All right folks – discussion has slowed to a gentle simmer both here and in #research. I’m going to put up two polls:
- Sentiment poll – please vote
- A specific question about the formula – vote or ignore as you wish
Sentiment poll
- Support moving to vote; I think this proposal is great!
- Support moving to vote; I think this set of documents is “good enough” and we shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good
- Oppose moving to vote; I have a specific issue I’m mentioning in the comments below
- Oppose moving to vote; other
- Undecided; I have a specific question I’d like clarified in the comments below
- Undecided; other
0
voters
Formula preference
- Natural log variant
- Piecewise linear
0
voters
Gory formula details
Either way we’re talking 0 weight below 10% pETH ratio. Then:
Natural log variant
weight = (13.6137 + 2 * ln(100 * (staked_rpl_value_in_eth / borrowed_eth) - 13)) * borrowed_eth
Piecewise linear variant
weight = rpl_stake_from_0-15% + .75*rpl_stake_from_15-17% + .5*rpl_stake_from_17-20% + .25*rpl_stake_from_20-30%
See also, discord for plots showing the total rewards, marginal aprs, and overall spending pie chart.